The Director-General of the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC), Brig.-Gen. Olakunle Oluseye Nafiu, has urged employers of corps members in Rivers State to provide conducive work environments that will enable them to enjoy productive and rewarding service years.

Nafiu made the call on Tuesday at the 2026 NYSC/Corps Employers’ Workshop held at the Port Harcourt City Council. The workshop, themed “Fine-tuning Stakeholders’ Collaboration to Enhance Corps Members’ Welfare and Workplace Experience,” brought together public and private sector employers and other stakeholders.

Represented by the Deputy Director, Certification and Mobilisation, NYSC South-South Area Office II, Port Harcourt, Mrs. Faustina Ilora, the Director-General described the workplace as the primary platform where corps members acquire practical experience, develop professional competence and contribute meaningfully to national development.

According to him, the quality of the workplace experience has a significant impact on corps members’ productivity, morale, personal development and overall perception of the NYSC scheme.

He therefore charged employers to assign corps members duties that align with their academic qualifications, while providing effective mentorship, proper supervision and opportunities for professional growth.

In his welcome address, the NYSC Rivers State Coordinator, Mr. Moses Oleghe, urged corps employers to regard the welfare of corps members and the provision of a conducive working environment as a sacred responsibility.

He expressed optimism that the workshop would equip participants with new strategies for strengthening collaboration and improving the implementation of the NYSC scheme in the state.

Delivering the keynote lecture, Dr. Sabastine Nwankwo Jr. of the Department of Political Science, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, called on employers to be deliberate in harnessing the talents and potential of corps members by creating workplaces that encourage innovation, productivity and personal development.

The workshop attracted a large turnout of stakeholders, including employers from government ministries, agencies, educational institutions and private organisations, all committed to enhancing the welfare and workplace experience of corps members in Rivers State.

The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has reaffirmed its commitment to strict compliance with the Public Procurement Act, declaring that adherence to due process remains central to ensuring transparency, accountability and value for money in project execution across the Niger Delta.

Speaking at a capacity-building workshop on public procurement for the Commission’s executive management and directors in Port Harcourt, the Managing Director, Dr Samuel Ogbuku, said the training was designed to deepen the understanding of procurement procedures among senior officials and strengthen institutional governance.

Ogbuku said the Commission had taken significant steps to reform its procurement system, including the digitisation of contract award letters to eliminate the circulation of fake documents that had previously exposed directors and contractors to investigations by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

He noted that the introduction of an electronic procurement (E-procurement) system was part of broader efforts to curb corruption, improve accountability and eliminate delays associated with manual procurement processes.

According to him, the Commission has reached a stage where strict compliance with government policies and procurement regulations is essential to achieving sustainable development in the Niger Delta.

The NDDC chief executive urged directors to ensure that all procurement requests align with approved procurement plans and annual budget provisions, stressing that procurement decisions must be guided by the region’s needs assessment.

He also advised management staff to develop a sound understanding of procurement procedures and subject vendors’ proposals to rigorous scrutiny in line with established priorities and due process requirements.

Ogbuku further called for prudence and selflessness in the management of public resources, describing sacrifice and accountability as indispensable qualities in public service.
Earlier, the Executive Director, Finance and Administration, Alabo Boma Iyaye, underscored the importance of continuous capacity building for public officials entrusted with the management of government funds.

Also speaking, the Director of Procurement, Dr Chuks Osuji, said the training was organised to strengthen the knowledge, skills and competencies of procurement professionals, project managers, finance officers and other stakeholders involved in the procurement value chain.

He reaffirmed the Commission’s commitment to investing in capacity development initiatives that promote integrity, transparency and professionalism while enhancing service delivery and good governance.

Delivering an overview of public procurement in Nigeria, the pioneer Director-General of the Bureau of Public Procurement, Engr. Emeka Eze, observed that procurement systems are designed primarily to prevent corruption rather than merely combat it.

He described public procurement as one of the areas of government most vulnerable to corrupt practices and urged participants to strictly adhere to established rules to avoid sanctions.

Eze identified transparency, integrity, openness, fairness, competition and accountability as the guiding principles of public procurement, while commending the NDDC for embracing E-procurement, which he described as a transformative step towards a more transparent and efficient procurement system.

The Rivers State House of Assembly has threatened to invoke its constitutional powers against Heirs Energies Limited over what it described as the company’s persistent refusal to honour legislative invitations concerning a petition filed by the Omuohia Community in Igwuruta Town, Ikwerre Local Government Area.

The Assembly directed the company’s Managing Director and management team to appear before lawmakers on Monday, July 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at the Rivers State House of Assembly Quarters, where plenary is temporarily being held, warning that failure to comply could attract sanctions under the 1999 Constitution.

The summons was conveyed in a letter dated July 7, 2026, signed by the Clerk of the House, Dr. Emeka Amadi, and addressed to the Managing Director of Heirs Energies Limited. A copy of the correspondence was obtained by our correspondent on Tuesday.

The Martin Amaewhule-led Assembly said the directive followed the consideration and adoption of the report of its Committee on Public Complaints and Petitions during the Fourth Legislative Sitting of the Fourth Session of the 10th Assembly.

Lawmakers expressed strong displeasure over what they termed the company’s “wilful refusal” to appear before the committee despite several invitations, describing the conduct as unacceptable and disrespectful to the legislative institution.

Consequently, the House warned that it would not hesitate to activate the enforcement provisions contained in Section 129 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), should the company fail to honour the latest summons.
Section 129 of the Constitution empowers a House of Assembly to compel the attendance of witnesses, require the production of documents and, where necessary, impose sanctions for non-compliance with legislative directives.

The petition before the Assembly was filed by the Omuohia Community in Igwuruta Town against Heirs Energies Limited, although details of the community’s grievances were not disclosed in the summons.

Part of the letter reads: “At the Fourth Legislative Sitting of the Fourth Session of the Tenth Assembly, the House considered the report of the House Committee on Public Complaints and Petitions on the petition by Omuohia Community in Igwuruta Town against Heirs Energies Limited and resolved to register its displeasure and condemn, in strong terms, the wilful refusal of Heirs Energies Limited to appear before the Committee despite several invitations to this effect.

“The House further resolved to invite you to appear before it with your management team on Monday, July 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at the Rivers State House of Assembly Quarters and warns that it will not hesitate to invoke its powers, in consonance with Section 129 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), should you fail to appear accordingly.

“You are requested to treat this invitation as a matter of utmost priority.”

More than 10,000 people died across Europe during the record-breaking heatwave that swept through the western part of the continent in June, with the overwhelming majority of the victims being elderly people, according to new mortality data.

Figures released by EuroMOMO, a mortality monitoring network supported by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), showed that 10,650 excess deaths were recorded across 27 European countries during the week of June 22 to 28, when temperatures peaked in France, Spain, the United Kingdom and several other nations.

Of the total, more than 9,000 deaths occurred among people aged 65 years and above, underscoring the devastating impact of extreme heat on older populations.

EuroMOMO said the excess mortality was far above seasonal expectations, noting that the combined mortality across the same countries had, in the preceding eight weeks, averaged about 500 fewer deaths per week than normal.

Chief Physician at Denmark’s Statens Serum Institut, which hosts EuroMOMO, Lasse Vestergaard, described the mortality surge as highly unusual.

“To have this kind of excess at this time of year is unusual. It’s really high,” Vestergaard said, adding that it was difficult to attribute the spike in deaths to anything other than the extreme heat.

Health experts explained that extreme heat can prove fatal by triggering heat stroke or worsening cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, with older people among the most vulnerable.

Scientists also linked the unprecedented heatwave to human-induced climate change, saying such an event would have been “virtually impossible” without global warming, which has made heatwaves more frequent, longer-lasting and more intense.

The data covered deaths from all causes rather than only those directly linked to heat. However, researchers said there were no major concurrent events, such as COVID-19 outbreaks, that could explain the sharp increase in mortality.

The late-June heatwave crippled parts of Europe, disrupting electricity supplies, forcing school closures and shattering temperature records in France, Spain and the United Kingdom.

Although EuroMOMO does not publish country-specific mortality figures, it reported that France and Belgium recorded “very high excess” mortality during the final week of June. Belgium’s public health institute, Sciensano, said the country’s excess mortality was the highest recorded during any heatwave since records began in 2000.

In a separate study published on Monday, researchers from Imperial College London, the UK Met Office and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine estimated that about 2,700 people died from heat-related causes in England and Wales during the May and June heatwaves.

The study further found that 42 per cent of those deaths were attributable to the additional heat generated by human-caused climate change, reinforcing growing concerns over the escalating human cost of global warming across Europe.

The management of Rivers State University (RSU) has reinforced its ban on final-year sign-out celebrations within the university community, warning that any student or visitor who violates the directive will face disciplinary action.

In an internal memorandum dated July 13, 2026, and signed by the Acting Registrar, Dr. Idanyingi I. Daminabo, the university said the decision followed increasing incidents of unruly behaviour, public disturbances and security concerns associated with sign-out celebrations by graduating students.

The management recalled that a similar prohibition was introduced last year, stressing that the directive remains in force and is aimed at protecting lives and property, preserving security and maintaining a peaceful academic environment.

Under the renewed directive, all final-year sign-out activities have been outlawed before, during and after the final examination period anywhere within the university community.

The university also prohibited students from wearing white shirts, white tops, jeans or any attire designed for sign-out celebrations, including writing, signing or scribbling on clothing.

To prevent gatherings linked to the celebrations, the institution barred parents, guardians, relatives, friends, photographers and other visitors from entering the campus for sign-out activities.

The management further banned the bringing into the university of cash for spraying, money bouquets, cakes, flowers, balloons, food, drinks, gift items and other celebratory materials.

It also outlawed activities capable of disrupting peace on campus, including splashing water, spraying substances, throwing powders or money, playing loud music, dancing in processions, blocking roads or engaging in any conduct that could cause disorder, intimidation, injury or damage to persons or property.

In addition, the university prohibited reckless driving, speeding, drifting, convoy movements, motorcycle stunts, excessive use of vehicle horns, sirens, security escorts and other dangerous vehicular displays within the campus.

The memorandum directed university security personnel and other designated officials to ensure strict enforcement of the directive across all campuses.

The Atlantic Bell reports that heads of campuses, provosts, deans, directors and heads of departments were also mandated to enforce compliance within their respective units.

The management warned that where a violation occurs and the offender is not identified or reported, the head of the affected department would be held accountable for failure to enforce the directive.

The university emphasised that any student or person found violating the order would be sanctioned in accordance with the institution’s rules and regulations.

Management reminded graduating students that the university’s convocation ceremony remains the only officially recognised platform for celebrating the successful completion of their academic programmes, urging them to conduct themselves in a manner that upholds the values and reputation of the institution.

The Atlantic Bell further reports that the directive, according to the memorandum, takes immediate effect.

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has sued the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), seeking a court order compelling the electoral umpire to investigate allegations that governors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) diverted about ₦800 billion from Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) allocations to finance political and campaign activities.

In the suit, filed last week before the Federal High Court in Abuja and marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1426/2026, SERAP is asking the court to issue an order of mandamus directing INEC to investigate the allegations and determine whether the reported contributions breached provisions of the Electoral Act governing campaign financing.

The organisation also wants the court to compel INEC to demand full disclosure from the APC and the affected governors on the alleged campaign fund, including the identities of contributors and the lawful sources of the funds.

SERAP further urged the court to direct the electoral commission to commence a comprehensive review of compliance with Section 91 of the Electoral Act, particularly regarding political donations, campaign financing and disclosure requirements by political parties and candidates in the current electoral cycle.

According to the rights group, the allegations raise fundamental concerns over transparency in political financing, electoral fairness and the constitutional right of Nigerians to participate freely in the democratic process.

It argued that opaque campaign financing remains a major conduit for corruption and undermines public confidence in democratic institutions.

In the suit filed by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare and Kehinde Oyewumi, SERAP contended that the alleged diversion of public funds for political purposes poses “a grave threat” to the credibility of the 2027 general elections.

The organisation maintained that large public financial flows, combined with weak transparency and oversight mechanisms, provide sufficient grounds for INEC to activate its constitutional and statutory powers to investigate and monitor political financing.

SERAP argued that Section 91 of the Electoral Act empowers INEC to regulate political donations, require disclosure of contributors and sources of campaign funds, and sanction individuals or political parties that exceed legally prescribed donation limits.

It noted that political parties found guilty of violating the donation ceiling risk fines of up to ₦10 million and forfeiture of excess funds, while individuals may be liable to penalties amounting to five times the value of contributions made beyond the legal limit.

According to SERAP, the Constitution, the Electoral Act and Nigeria’s obligations under international anti-corruption and human rights treaties impose clear responsibilities on INEC to prevent the misuse of state resources for electoral advantage and to guarantee transparency in political financing.

The organisation further argued that where allegations suggest that public resources may have been channelled into political campaigns outside lawful procedures, INEC has a legal duty to investigate and enforce the relevant provisions of the law.

SERAP also cited Sections 13, 14 and 15 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as well as Nigeria’s obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, insisting that electoral integrity cannot be guaranteed without accountability in campaign financing.

It warned that any diversion of public funds for partisan political purposes would amount to a serious abuse of public trust, distort electoral competition and undermine the principle of a level playing field.

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.