- Groups urge NASS To Reject Proposed Regulation
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) and the Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) have threatened legal action against the National Assembly if it passes the proposed Foreign Aids (Regulation, Transparency and Disclosure) Bill, 2026, warning that the legislation could undermine civic space, media freedom and democratic participation.
The organisations urged the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas, to immediately reject and withdraw the bill, which is sponsored by Senator Ibrahim Dankwambo (PDP, Gombe North).
In a joint open letter dated August 29 and signed by SERAP Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, and NGE General Secretary, Onuoha Ukeh, the groups described the bill as “unnecessary, unlawful, unconstitutional” and capable of giving the government extensive powers over civil society organisations, independent media, religious bodies and private entities receiving foreign assistance.
They argued that although the bill was presented as a measure to promote transparency, it would establish what they described as an intrusive regulatory framework, including mandatory registration, disclosure and monitoring requirements for organisations and entities receiving foreign grants, donations or other forms of assistance.
The proposed legislation provides for the establishment of a Foreign Aid Regulatory Commission (FARC), which would have powers to register affected organisations, maintain databases, compel information, inspect records, conduct investigations and audits, monitor the utilisation of foreign assistance and impose administrative sanctions.
Under the proposed framework, non-compliant civil society organisations and private entities could face a minimum fine of N20 million, as well as suspension or revocation of operating licences, while individuals could also face fines and imprisonment.
SERAP and NGE argued that the proposed regulatory regime was unnecessary because Nigeria already has institutions responsible for corporate registration, financial reporting, taxation, anti-money laundering and anti-corruption enforcement.
They listed the Corporate Affairs Commission, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Special Control Unit against Money Laundering, Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit and Federal Inland Revenue Service among the agencies with existing statutory responsibilities in these areas.
“Nothing in the Bill demonstrates that these institutions are unable to perform their statutory responsibilities or that any regulatory gap justifies creating another regulator with overlapping and potentially intrusive powers,” the organisations said.
They also criticised what they described as vague provisions in the bill, particularly references to “foreign aid”, “national priorities” and “public interest”, arguing that the absence of clear definitions and objective standards could facilitate arbitrary enforcement.
The groups expressed particular concern about the potential impact on independent journalism, noting that many media and civil society organisations rely on foreign grants to fund investigative journalism, fact-checking, journalist safety, media development and other public-interest activities.
They warned that subjecting such organisations to an additional executive-controlled regulatory regime could increase government influence over their operations and create conditions conducive to self-censorship.
The organisations said the proposed legislation could affect a wide range of bodies, including independent media organisations, labour unions, professional associations, universities, research institutes, religious and humanitarian organisations, technology hubs and other entities receiving foreign grants or technical assistance.
They further criticised provisions requiring recipients of foreign assistance to disclose information on the sources, amounts and conditions attached to funding, with details to be published on a proposed National Foreign Aid Register.
According to SERAP and NGE, requiring foreign-funded projects to conform to government-defined national development priorities, alongside mandatory audits, criminal sanctions and possible licence revocation, would impose a disproportionate burden on legitimate organisations.
The groups said the bill was inconsistent with Sections 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, which guarantee freedom of expression and association.
They also argued that the proposed framework conflicted with Nigeria’s obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other international standards protecting civic space, freedom of association and media freedom.
SERAP and NGE said the concerns were particularly significant ahead of the 2027 general elections, warning that further restrictions on civil society and independent media could weaken democratic participation and public accountability.
They urged the National Assembly to withdraw the bill and refrain from introducing legislation that, in their view, would unjustifiably restrict civic space, media freedom or the legitimate activities of civil society organisations and private entities.
The organisations also called on lawmakers to prioritise legislation promoting transparency, accountability, media freedom and civic participation while strengthening the operating environment for independent civil society, humanitarian, religious and media organisations.
They warned that should the bill be passed despite the constitutional and human rights concerns raised, they would consider “all appropriate legal action in the public interest” to challenge the legislation and defend freedom of association, media freedom and civic participation.
















